Loading...
MINDS Hero Image

Redefining MINDS@UW

Transforming a complex academic repository into a user-centered platform that serves 3,000+ researchers across the University of Wisconsin system.

Process Highlight

Challenge and responsibilities


Challenge

How do you redesign a complex academic platform to serve multiple user types—from first-time student depositors to expert librarians—while maintaining the sophisticated functionality that power users depend on?

Scope

Complete platform redesign including public interface, admin workflows, and analytics systems.


Timeline

Mar 2024 - Sep 2024

Disciplines

User Experience Research

User Experience Design

Role

UX Researcher

UX Designer

UX Writer

Tools

Figma

FigJam

Slack

BrowserStack Accessibility Toolkit

Problem

Users felt lost and uncertain about how to engage with the platform


Imagine having access to over 32,000 research papers, datasets, and academic treasures—but feeling completely lost every time you try to find or contribute to this wealth of knowledge. This was the pain point of thousands of researchers, librarians, and students using MINDS@UW, the University of Wisconsin's institutional repository.

Before

Identified issues at MINDS Homepage

MINDS@UW is rich in valuable resources, but the complexity and unintuitive design make it harder for users to access and contribute to the repository efficiently.

Solution

A comprehensive academic discovery ecosystem


Solution main banner

Analytics for Institutional Impact

MINDS Analytics Solution

This wasn't just a UI refresh. It was a complete reimagining of how an academic community discovers, contributes to, and manages institutional knowledge.

Impact

The value created for users and admins


Identified issues at MINDS Homepage
Inclusive Platform Experience Icon

Inclusive Platform Experience

Transformed an exclusive-feeling platform into one that fosters belonging for every university in the UW system.

Reduced Admin Burden

Reduced Admin Burden

Proactive user guidance projected to decrease support requests by 50%.

Increased Platform Adoption

Increased Platform Adoption

A more intuitive experience expected to drive higher user adoption and research deposits.

Overview

MINDS@UW is a research repository, where thousands of researchers preserve their academic work


It holds groundbreaking datasets, doctoral dissertations, and research papers—discoveries that could change the world, stored across 10+ University of Wisconsin campuses and trusted to be discoverable when the academic community needs them most: during late-night research sessions, grant proposals, and breakthrough moments.

Resources that MINDS holds
Competitive Analysis

Repositories looked clean, but buried their most important action


When I analyzed repositories, I noticed a clear theme: most competitors invested in clean, minimal designs with strong search visibility. But when it came to the core task of depositing work, the action repositories exist for, the experience often broke down. Contribution was either hidden, inconsistent, or only accessible to certain users.

  • Duke University
  • Syracuse University
  • Cornell University

DukeSpace

The interface felt clean, but critical actions like depositing were hard to find.

Upfront and easy to use search bar.

Focus on the functionality with less content.

No visible option to deposit work/collection.

No task flow for users who do not have a Duke ID.

Prominent CTAs for upload and browse.

Duke Space Website

Surface

Engaging design with a major emphasis on data visualization.

Interactive homepage with data visualizations.

Hero image, side and top navbar stand out.

Prominent CTAs for upload and browse.

Prominent CTAs for upload and browse.

Prominent CTAs for upload and browse.

Surface Website

eCommons

Clean and readable design with a strong focus on helping users deposit their work.

"Make a Deposit" section provides quick and necessary information.

Clear call-to-action as “Submit your work” button.

Options available for both NetID and non-NetID users.

A brief but informative description of the website's purpose.

Content that explains the benefits of submitting work.

eCommons Website

MINDS needed to stand out by making contribution and discovery the most obvious and effortless actions.

Target Users

A single platform, but users with competing needs


I needed to understand who MINDS was really serving. There were three very different groups with competing priorities: Admins, the super-users; UW-Madison Users, the primary contributors; and UW System Users, an overlooked group from outside Madison. Mapping these groups early revealed tensions between administration and contribution, shaping who I needed to talk to next.

Initial Obervations

For users ease of access is critical, navigation should not be a guessing game


I had conversations with librarians, department admins, researchers, and even first-time users to understand how and why they used the platform, what painponts they faced, and the conversations were eye opening.

Journey map of Anna Chan

It is designed around admins and depositors, not for users who are trying to use MINDS as users/readers of data.

- Admin

From an identity perspective, it is hard to push on our campus because it looks very Madison, which I know is run by the system.

- Researcher

It's not immediately clear how to start a submission.

- Researcher

Key Insight: There was a fundamental disconnect. MINDS was designed around administrators, but left everyday users struggling. Researchers couldn't find a clear way to start submissions, system librarians felt disconnected, and many described navigation as "a guessing game. Features like access requests for closed collections were broken by gaps in communication"

Synthesis

I had to find signal in the noise


I clustered notes to uncover which problems kept surfacing, what users appreciated, and what expectations they carried into the system. This was the most exciting part, analyzing data not just to find patterns, but to turn user voices into a clear path forward.

9 Interviews
170+ Data Points
4 Insights
7 Major Themes
Generating Insights

What kept users from trusting and using MINDS


Here are the 4 key insights I extracted after analysing the data obtained from the user interviews:

Broken Navigation
Identity Issues
Value gap
Access Barrier

One thing that I noticed was how fragmented the experience had become: different users were trying to do the same tasks but through completely different, undocumented paths. Still, what struck me most was the emotion behind it, people wanted MINDS to succeed. They saw its potential, but it needed to evolve from an administrative repository into a truly public, research-driven space for everyone.

Converging The Process

Defining the north star


And after all the research and findings, I converged the problem space and had a guiding question to inform design for the diverse users of the platform:

How Might We Statement
Insights to Strategy

Clear CTAs, inclusive representation and communication regarding closed collections could transform MINDS


Thinking and strategizing at a systems level was the way to move ahead. I had a wall full of ideas, but not all of them could move forward. I started connecting dots between what users needed most and what was technically possible.

Some things were obvious, like improving how users browse or making submissions easier with clear CTAs. Others needed deeper thinking: how do we highlight the value each UW campus brings, or fix the long-standing confusion around closed collections?

Developing a Solution

Collaborative Wins

  • Worked with engineers to assess technical feasibility.
  • Reframed analytics dashboard as a separate hosted service.
Ideation

Screen Designs


After prioritizing the insights, I designed new screens and improved existing pages. My focus was on addressing key pain points identified during user interviews like having clear call-to-actions CTAs and navigation while maintaining visual consistency with MINDS@UW's existing design language.

Initial Screen Designs of the Solution
Ideation

Wireframes


The screen designs guided me to create wireframes. The wireframes were focussed towards better navigation particularly from browsers perspectives. I made sure to recognize all UW schools and their contributions via the wireframes. The initial designs also focussed to simplyfy user education about the platform and value-add of the repository.

Final Designs

A simple, inclusive and research-focussed platform


The new design focused on making the experience simple and user friendly. I focussed on fixing issues that users most persistently faced. This included providing clear CTAs for most frequently done actions, reducing confusion through clear communication, designing an analytics dashboard to highlight the institution's impact and making analysis and reporting easier and faster.

A homepage that empowers discovery and contribution

The new interface simplifies navigation with clear CTAs, educates users on repository use, and visualizes research impact through integrated analytics creating a unified experience for the UW research community.

Celebrating diversity within a shared pursuit of knowledge

The new design connects diverse UW campuses through a consistent visual framework, celebrating each university's role in advancing research and promoting shared access to knowledge.''

Screen showcasing all UW communities
Screen showcasing communities collection

Designing clarity into administrative workflows

Access Management gives librarians a structured space to review, respond, and automate access requests. The redesign simplifies how permissions are handled and ensures communication stays clear, timely, and consistent across the repository.

Making research provenance visible

Every update, author, and version is now clearly documented, giving researchers, students, and reviewers the context they need to understand the work's evolution and credibility.

Analytics - Overview
Analytics - Top Content
Analytics - Usage Trends
Analytics - Geographic Reach
Analytics - Files

Measuring what matters

Behind every number is a story, a researcher's discovery, a librarian's effort, a reader's curiosity. The analytics dashboard transforms those data points into a shared picture of growth, collaboration, and impact.

Accessibility

Designing for everyone


A critical requirement for the libraries is accessibility. I used tools like the BrowserStack Accessibility Toolkit to actively test my design against WCAG standards. This allowed me to validate key areas, from ensuring high-contrast text to simulating how the design would look for users with various forms of color blindness. This testing process was crucial for building an inclusive foundation and ensuring the platform is usable by the widest possible audience in academia.

Resources that MINDS holds
Learnings

What were my takeaways?


This project provided valuable insights into user-centered design and the importance of addressing both functional and emotional needs of users. Through the redesign of MINDS@UW, I learned the following key lessons:

  • The Power of Clear Navigation and CTAs: Prominent, well-placed calls to action (CTAs), such as "Make a Deposit" and "Browse Communities", significantly enhance usability by guiding users toward their main tasks and reducing confusion.
  • User Education Enhances Engagement: Providing clear, concise guidance, like the "How to Deposit" and "Benefits" sections, empowers users, builds trust, and reduces frustration by helping them understand how to use the platform effectively.
  • User Feedback Drives Design Decisions: Iterative design, based on direct user feedback, was essential in addressing pain points such as navigation difficulty and lack of visibility for other UW schools' contributions, resulting in a more intuitive and inclusive experience.

Thank you for your time.

Previous:
Next: